 |
ACETIC AND FORMIC ACIDS IN WORKPLACE
ATMOSPHERES |
 |
| Method No: |
ID-186SG |
|
| Control No: |
T-ID186SG-PV-01-9304-M |
|
| Matrix: |
Air |
|
| OSHA Standard: |
5.0 ppm for Formic Acid, HCOOH 10.0 ppm for Acetic
Acid, CH3COOH |
|
| Collection Procedure: |
A known volume of air is drawn through a charcoal
tube. Acetic and Formic acids are collected on the charcoal
tube. |
|
| Recommended Air Volume: |
48 liters maximum |
|
| Recommended Sampling Rate: |
0.2 liters per minute |
|
| Analytical Procedure: |
The charcoal is desorbed in 0.0015 M borate eluent and
is analyzed by Ion Chromatography (IC). |
|
| Quantitative Detection Limit: |
0.0016 ppm for HCOOH 0.006 ppm for
CH3COOH |
|
| Precision and Accuracy: |
CV1 = 0.018 for
HCOOH
0.016 for CH3COOH |
|
| Method Classification: |
P |
|
|
| This method was last revised on April 8,
1993 |
Methods Development Team Industrial Hygiene Chemistry
Division Salt Lake Technical Center Salt Lake City, Utah
84115-1802
- Introduction
This method describes the collection by charcoal tube and analysis
using Ion Chromatography of acetic and formic acids. The method measures
the total concentration of the airborne anions. The corresponding acids
may be collected on a single charcoal tube and determined
simultaneously.
1.1 History
Prior to the use of this method, acetic acid was collected on
charcoal tubes, desorbed in 0.1 N NaOH and analyzed by gas
chromatography. Before that, acetic and formic acids were collected in
0.01 N NaOH, and were analyzed by ion chromatography.
1.2 Uses (9.1, 9.2)
Acetic acid is mainly used in the manufacture of cellulose acetate
fibers and plastics, ester solvents, dyes, metal salts, and many other
chemicals. Acetic acid is one of the most important industrial organic
acids. It is most widely known in the form of vinegar, which is a dilute
aqueous solution of acetic acid.
Formic acid is important in textile souring, leather preparation, and
cattle-fodder preservation. It is also used in the textile industry, and
as an intermediate in the production of many chemicals. It is also
used as a coagulant for rubber latex. Formic acid is used in nickel
plating baths, and in the production of wire-stripping compounds needed
for soldering bare wire.
1.3 Physical Properties (9.1, 9.2)
Acetic acid, CH3COOH, is a colorless, water-like liquid
that has a sharp, vinegary odor and a burning taste. Commercial grades
of acetic acid are approximately 99.5% pure. Acetic acid is soluble in
alcohol and water. Acetic acid is highly caustic to the skin.
Formic acid, HCOOH, is a colorless, odorous acid. It is the first and
strongest of the unsubstituted series of carboxylic acids. Formic acid
decomposes readily to water and carbon monoxide. Formic acid or its
aqueous solutions dissolve many of the more active, main group metals
and their oxides to give corresponding formates. The anhydrous acid must
be handled with the same care as concentrated sulfuric acid. It is a
powerful dehydrating agent and serious burns can result from its action
on the skin. Formic acid burns when ignited. Commercial grades of formic
acid are approximately 90% pure. Formic acid is soluble in water,
alcohol, ether, and glycerol.
| Physical Constants: |
HCOOH |
CH3COOH |
|
|
|
| Density, 20.0ºC: |
1.220 g/cm3 |
1.049 g/mL |
|
|
|
| Melting Point: |
8.4ºC |
16.6ºC |
|
|
|
| Boiling Point: |
100.7ºC |
117.9ºC |
|
|
|
| Formula Weight: |
46.03 |
60.06 |
- Working Range and Detection Limit (9.3.)
2.1 The working range for a 48 liter air sample is 0.002 to 0.05 ppm
for HCOO¯ and CH3COO¯. This corresponds
to 0.1 to 2.5 µg. The upper range can be extended by sample
dilution.
2.2 The quantitative detection limits for acetic and formic acids
were calculated using the IUPAC Method. The detection limits are as
follows at a confidence level of 99.86%:
HCOOH = 0.0016 ppm or 16 ng CH3COOH =
0.006 ppm or 60 ng
The detection limits were calculated based on a sample volume of 10
mL and an injection volume of 50 µL. The detection limits for each
analyte were calculated in the presence of the other. The detection
limits are for a 48 liter air volume at a 0.2 liters per minute sampling
rate.
- Stability of acetic and formic acids on charcoal tubes.
3.1 A recovery study of acetic and formic acids was done at the 0.5X,
1.0×, and 2.0× levels. Six samples at each of three levels were spiked,
let sit for an hour and then desorbed with 0.0015 M borate eluent. The
samples were analyzed by ion chromatography. The results can be seen in
Table III. Two problems were seen in the formic acid analysis. First the
charcoal tubes contained an interference which had the same retention
time as formic acid. The mean of this interference is 85.9 µg (n = 5,
std. dev. = 12.2) for section A, and 48.7 µg (n = 5, std. dev. = 3.3)
for section B. The second problem is that the formic acid is not stable
unless refrigerated. See section 3.2. NIOSH found a CVT of
0.058, with a CV1 of 0.007 and a CV2 of 0.030 for
their recoveries when desorbed with formic acid and analyzed for acetic
acid by gas chromatography (9.4).
3.2 Acetic acid recovery from charcoal tubes after 2 weeks of storage
is 93% when the samples are not refrigerated and 96% when refrigerated.
Formic acid recovery is 18% for samples stored for two weeks when not
refrigerated and 82% when refrigerated. Therefore, the samples must be
kept refrigerated at 4ºC when analysis of formic acid is desired. See
Table I.
3.3 Once the samples are desorbed in 0.0015 M borate eluent, they are
stable for at least 2 weeks. Samples desorbed in the manner just
described and kept unrefrigerated for 2 weeks showed a recovery of 94%
for formic acid and 90% for acetic acid.
3.4 Acetate and formate standards in 0.0015 M borate eluent were
determined to be stable for at least 2 weeks.
3.5 A breakthrough study was conducted under the following
conditions.
Six charcoal tubes were spiked with acetic and formic acids at 2.0×
the PEL and then exposed to 80% humidity air at 22ºC at a flow of rate
0.2 liters/minute for four hours. No breakthrough was detected in the
second portion of the charcoal tubes for either acetic or formic acid.
The results of the breakthrough study can be seen in Table II. A typical
chromatogram of a standard containing 1.0 µg acetate and formate is
shown in Figure I.
- Interferences
4.1 Butyric and propionic acids can cause an interference. If butyric
acid is present, it can be separated from the formic acid peak by
changing the flow rate to 1.0 mL/min. Propionic acid is difficult to
separate from the acetic acid peak. The presence of butyric or propionic
acids in the workplace must be reported to the
laboratory.
- Advantages and Disadvantages
5.1 The method is accurate and easily automated.
5.2 The sampling procedure uses charcoal tubes as opposed to older
impinger sampling methods for these acids. Such a sampling procedure
eliminates the inherent problems of spillage and release of a caustic
solution or the potential contamination of the pump while using a
impinger.
- Sampling Procedure
6.1 Apparatus - Charcoal tubes, SKC Cat. No. 226-09 (or equivalent
charcoal tubes which have been demonstrated to show low levels of the
anions of interest), personal sampling pump which are calibrated at the
recommended flow rate with a charcoal tube in line to an accuracy of
±10% at the 95% confidence limit.
6.2 The charcoal tube is attached to a calibrated personal sampling
pump and the sampling tube is placed in the worker's breathing zone or
in a area of the workplace. At least 10 liters of air should be drawn
through the sampling tube.
6.3 After the desired sampling period is completed, the charcoal tube
is removed from the pump. The charcoal tubes are then properly
identified and official sealed with a OSHA Form 21, and shipped to the
laboratory for analysis. Samples taken for formic acid must be shipped
to the laboratory via overnight mail on ice. Proper planning should be
undertaken to eliminate any possible delay in samples arriving at the
laboratory before the ice is spent.
6.4 With each batch of up to 20 samples, a blank tube which has had
no air drawn through it, is submitted for analysis. The blank tube
should be from the same lot of tubes used for sampling.
6.5 It is very important that when particulate acids or salts of an
acid are known to be present in the workplace atmosphere each should be
listed as interferences. It is important to note the presence of other
low molecular weight carboxylic acids, particularly propionic
acid.
- Analytical Procedure
7.1 Apparatus - Ion exchange chromatograph and recorder, or
integrator (an auto sampler helps automate the analysis), 10 mL pipette,
1 mL plastic syringe with male Luer fitting, anion separator column with
precolumn, anion membrane suppressor, and appropriate volumetric
glassware for dilutions and standard preparation.
7.2 Reagents - All reagents used should be ACS analyzed reagent grade
or better.
7.2.1 Deionized water with a specific conductance of 10 umho/cm or
less for preparation of eluents and other solutions which will be used
in the Ion Chromatograph.
7.2.2 Sodium Borate
(Na2B407·10H20).
7.2.3 Acetate Stock Standard (1000 µg/mL
CH3COO¯). Dissolve 0.6948 g of Sodium Acetate
(CH3COONa) or 1.1525 g of
CH3COONa·3H20 into 500 mL deionized
water.
7.2.4 Formate Stock Standard (1000 µg/mL
HCOO¯). Dissolve 0.7554 g of Sodium Formate
(HCOONa) into 500 mL deionized water.
7.2.5 Borate Eluent and Desorption Solution (0.0015 M
B4O7=). Dissolve 1.25 g Sodium Borate
(Na2B4O7·10H2O) in a 2
liter volumetric flask and dilute to volume with deionized water.
Sonicate the solution under a vacuum for 5 minutes before
use.
7.2.6 Regenerant Solution (0.025 N H2SO4).
Add 2.8 mL of concentrated H2SO4 to 4 liters in
deionized water. Sonicate the solution under a vacuum for 5 minutes
before use.
7.3 Safety Precautions
7.3.1 When using the Ion Chromatograph, the column door should be
kept closed during the analysis in case the columns burst. To avoid
this danger the pressure should be checked at the beginning of the
analysis and periodically during the analysis.
7.3.2 Care should be used when handling reagents, especially the
regenerant solution (0.025 N H2SO4) to avoid
chemical burns.
7.3.3 Care should be exercised when using laboratory glassware.
Chipped pipettes, volumetric flasks, beakers, or any glassware with
sharp edges exposed should not be used to avoid the possibility of
cuts, abrasions, and lost samples.
7.3.4 Pipetting should never be done by mouth - a bulb should
always be used.
7.4 Standard Preparation
7.4.1 Working standards are prepared in the analytical range of 2
µg/mL to 50 µg/mL from dilutions of the 1000 µg/mL stock solutions.
These standard solutions should be diluted to volume in 0.0015 M
borate eluent and prepared fresh weekly.
7.4.2 If an auto sampler capable of variable volume injections is
used, a combination 50 µg/mL acetate and formate standard is used.
This intermediate working standard should be prepared fresh weekly.
Injection volumes should always be 50 microliters or above for
standards or samples.
7.5 Sample Preparation
7.5.1 The charcoal tube used to collect acetic and formic acids is
separated into 2 parts. The first section (section A) contains 100 mg
charcoal. The backup section (section B) contains 50 mg charcoal and
will collect any acid which passes through and is not collected by
section A. Sections A and B are separated by a foam plug which is to
be discarded.
7.5.2 Score the sampler with a file in front of the primary sorbant
section (section A), then break the sampler at the score line.
Transfer section A to a clean, labeled 20 mL vial. Place charcoal
section B in a separate clean, labeled 20 mL vial.
7.5.3 If the air volume is greater than or equal to 10 liters
pipette 10 mL of 0.1 N desorption solution into each sample vial and
cap tightly. If the air volume is less than 10 liters use 5 mL
desorption solution.
7.5.4 Let the samples sit overnight in the vials, or sonicate the
samples for 10 minutes. Sample solutions must be filtered before
analysis using LID/X syringe filters from Xydex Corporation, or
equivalent, and the blank should be treated in a similar
manner.
7.5.5 If using an auto sampler, transfer some of the sample into an
appropriate sampling vial. If using the WISP autosampler, the vial
should be at least half full. Label each vial with the appropriate
laboratory identification number. If using the Dionex autosampler,
place an aliquot of 0.63 mL of each sample in separate polyvials. When
using automatic injection use a 50 µL injection volume. The
autosampler is less accurate below 50 µL.
7.5.6 For hand injection, use 1 mL of the eluent to flush the 0.1
mL injection loop thoroughly.
7.6 Analysis (9.4)
7.6.1 For general instrument start up and operation, refer to
Section 8 of the Ion Chromatography Standard Operating
Procedure.
7.6.2 The normal instrument parameters are:
Sensitivity: 30 µmho full scale Eluent: 0.0015 M
B4O7= Flow Rate: 2.0
L/min Run Time: Approximately 10 minutes.
7.6.3 If using the WISP autosampler, after the instrument is set up
and stabilized, place the auto sampling vials into the sampling tray
using tray positions one through five for standards.
7.6.4 If using the Dionex autosampler, refer to sections 8.1 to 8.3
of the Standard Operating Procedure.
7.6.5 Enter the proper parameters into the auto sampler (See the
Ion Chromatography Standard Operating Procedure).
7.6.6 Start the auto sampler and observe the first few
chromatograms to ensure proper operation. Periodically check the zero
offset between samples to correct any baseline drift and to ensure
proper sensitivity and retention time of the analytes.
7.6.7 Use the timer to stop the run if the auto sampler is to be
left unattended.
7.6.8 Record the sample number onto the chromatogram. Keep a record
of the sample identity and instrument conditions.
7.6.9 As the analysis proceeds, check the retention times of
standards vs. samples to ensure uniformity.
7.6.10 If interfering substances are present, establish positive
identity of the peaks by spiking known amounts of standard solution or
try to obtain better separation by changing the eluent concentration
or by reducing the flow rate.
7.7 Calculations
7.7.1 Peak areas or heights of the standards are used to construct
a standard curve using the OSHA Auto Colorimetric Program. The samples
results are obtained from a plot of peak height or peak area vs.
concentration. The blank corrected sample values are then calculated
using the Auto Colorimetric Program.
7.7.2 When using the
OSHA Auto Colorimetric Program, sample numbers and volumes are entered
into the calculator in the following manner:
Sample Number, Peak Area or Height, L Air Volume, mL Solution
Volume, mL Aliquot Volume.
7.7.3 Air Concentration values are calculated by the following
equation:

GF* = Gravimetric Factor = 1.02 for HCOOH and
CH3COOH
7.7.4 Acetic and formic acids are reported in ppm. To convert the
mg/m3 values to ppm, the mg/m3 value must be
multiplied by the appropriate conversion factor.
| Acid |
Conversion Factor |
|
|
| HCOOH |
0.532 |
|
|
| CH3COOH |
0.407 |
- Reporting Results for Compounds Determined by Ion
Chromatography
8.1 Results are reported on the OSHA Form 91 in ppm for HCOOH and
CH3COOH, using two significant figures.
8.2 The estimated detection limit calculated by the Auto Colorimetric
Program is reported on the OSHA Form 91 when no analyte is
detected.
8.3 The presence of significant unidentifiable peaks is noted on the
OSHA Form 91.
8.4 All data processor printouts and chart recorded chromatograms are
filed in a central file according to laboratory sample
identification.
8.5 Calculations are checked by a fellow chemist before the completed
OSHA Form 91's are given to the supervisor.
-
References
9.1 Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Third
Edition, 1978, Vol. 1 and 11.
9.2 Merck Index, Tenth Edition, 1983.
9.3 OSHA Ion Chromatography Standard Operating Procedure,
Prepared by the Ion Chromatography Committee, Occupational Safety &
Health Administration Analytical Laboratory, Inorganic
Division.
9.4 Backup Data Report for Acetic Acid Method (by GC),
NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH.
TABLE I STABILITY STUDY
|
|
Refrigerated |
|
|
| ----------- Acetic
Acid----------- |
----------- Formic
Acid----------- |
| Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
| 1.034 |
1.051 |
0.964 |
1.149 |
0.999 |
0.821 |
|
|
Unrefrigerated |
|
|
| ----------- Acetic
Acid----------- |
----------- Formic
Acid----------- |
| Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
| 1.034 |
1.026 |
0.931 |
1.149 |
0.285 |
0.182 |
TABLE II BREAKTHROUGH STUDY
| Sample # |
Recovery Acetic Acid |
Recovery Formic Acid |
| 1 |
0.777 |
0.700 |
| 2 |
0.764 |
0.723 |
| 3 |
0.787 |
0.691 |
| 4 |
0.774 |
0.716 |
| 5 |
0.782 |
0.714 |
| 6 |
0.752 |
0.695 |
| Mean |
0.773 |
0.706 |
| Std Dev |
0.013 |
0.013 |
TABLE III RECOVERY STUDY Acetic
Acid Found/Theoretical
| Sample # |
0.5× PEL |
1.0× PEL |
2.0× PEL |
| 1 |
0.924 |
0.878 |
1.071 |
| 2 |
1.177 |
0.951 |
1.080 |
| 3 |
0.999 |
0.951 |
0.980 |
| 4 |
0.986 |
0.759 |
0.982 |
| 5 |
0.921 |
0.784 |
1.005 |
| 6 |
0.940 |
0.850 |
0.999 |
| n = |
6 |
6 |
6 |
| Mean = |
0.991 |
0.862 |
1.020 |
| Std Dev = |
0.097 |
0.081 |
0.045 |
| CV1 = |
0.098 |
0.094 |
0.044 |
| CV1 (pooled) |
|
0.0068 |
|
Formic Acid Found/Theoretical
| Sample # |
0.5× PEL |
1.0× PEL |
2.0× PEL |
| 1 |
1.108 |
0.966 |
1.069 |
| 2 |
1.338 |
1.032 |
0.982 |
| 3 |
1.159 |
0.994 |
0.920 |
| 4 |
1.272 |
0.792 |
0.931 |
| 5 |
1.032 |
0.855 |
1.009 |
| 6 |
1.334 |
0.920 |
0.972 |
| n = |
6 |
6 |
6 |
| Mean = |
1.207 |
0.926 |
0.980 |
| Std Dev = |
0.127 |
0.090 |
0.054 |
| CV1 = |
0.105 |
0.097 |
0.055 |
| CV1 (pooled) |
|
0.0078 |
|
|